This judgment dismisses an appeal against a Single Judge's ruling that the petitioner lacked requisite experience for a driver post. The High Court also dismissed the appeal due to unexplained delay and latches in the original writ petition.
The appeal is dismissed on merits and due to delay and latches in the underlying writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
L.P.A. No. 394 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision : March 14, 2011
Ram Phal Sharma
….Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN
Present : Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the appellant.
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
M.M. KUMAR, J.
( M.M. KUMAR )
JUDGE
March 14, 2011 satish
( T.P.S. MANN ) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to appointment on the post of driver lacking three years' experience.
Whether the delay and latches in filing the writ petition warrants condonation for filing the appeal.
Ram Phal Sharma
State of Haryana
M.M. KUMAR
T.P.S. MANN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
