The Chief Justice held there was no live issue for adjudication and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after hearing the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No. 9218 of 1994
Date of decision: 1.4.2011
A.S.Tung
..........Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary, Local Self Government Department Punjab ......Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Present: None for the petitioner
Mr. J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent
RANJAN GOGOI, CJ. : (Oral)
Having regard to the subject matter of the writ petition and after hearing Shri J.S.Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab we are of the view that there is no live issue for adjudication in this writ petition.
Writ petition is, consequently, dismissed as infructuous.
(RANJAN GOGOI) CHIEF JUSTICE
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE
April 1, 2011 RSK
NOTE : Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not? _____
AS TUNG
THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT PUNJAB
RANJAN GOGOI
KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
