The Acting Chief Justice dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition notifications as infructuous after the State reported that the land had already been notified for SEZ purposes and acquisition proceedings were pending in a related challenge.
The writ petition was rendered infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 8912 of 1991
1
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8912 of 1991
Date of Decision: November 07, 2011
M/s. G.E.O. Miller & Co., (P.) Ltd.
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State
M.M. KUMAR, Acg. CJ.
CWP No. 8912 of 1991
2
(M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE
November 07, 2011 Atul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging land acquisition notifications has been rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. G.E.O. Miller & Co., (P.) Ltd.
State of Haryana
M.M. KUMAR
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
