Dismissed

Dalip Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Mar 2011CWP/3596/1990

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses eight civil writ petitions filed in 1990 challenging notifications and awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court found that identical connected petitions were previously dismissed on the grounds of no discrimination and validity of the Act's provisions. Relying on that prior order, the petitions in the current batch were allowed to go with them.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions were dismissed in terms of the order passed in CWP No. 2254 of 1990.

Dalip Singh Vs State of Haryana — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2011)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3596 OF 1990

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

DATE OF DECISION: March 17, 2011.

Parties Name

Daleep Singh

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Haryana and another

¶10

...RESPONDENTS

¶11

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg

¶12

PRESENT: Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate, Advocate, for the petitioner

¶13

Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 3726 of 1990.

¶14

Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondents.

¶15

Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for HUDA in CWP No.3726 of 1990.

¶16

Jasbir Singh, J. (oral)

¶17

JUDGMENT

¶18

This order will dispose of eight writ petitions, i.e., Civil Writ Petitions No. 3596, 3726, 3747, 3760, 3816, 4062, 4063, 3724 and 5889, all of the year 1990, as common question of law and facts is involved in all these cases. For facility of dictating order, facts are being mentioned in

¶19

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3596 OF 1990

¶20

-2-

¶21

CWP No. 3596 of 1990.

¶22

Vide order dated March 16, 2011, this Court dismissed civil writ petitions No. 2254, 2946, 2975, 2976 and 3003, all of the year 1990, in which notifications, which are impugned in these writ petitions, were under challenge. By noting facts on the file, this Court came to a conclusion that no case of discrimination was made out and further that notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, dated January 30, 1989 and January 25, 1990, respectively and Award passed on January 22, 1992, were as per provisions of the Act.

¶23

Counsel for the respondents states that these writ petitions are to be dismissed in terms of the order dated March 16, 2011, passed by this Court in CWP No. 2254 of 1990 and other four connected matters. After hearing counsel for the parties and perusing the judgment, mentioned above, we are satisfied that the averment made is perfectly justified. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to distinguish the facts of this case from the facts of the case, which was disposed of on March 16, 2011 (C.W.P. No. 2254 of 1990).

¶24

In view of above, these writ petitions are dismissed in terms of an order passed in CWP No. 2254 of 1990.

¶25

March 17 , 2011. DKC

Dalip Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dalip Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fateh Singh & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Anar Kaur Vs State of Haryana

Vas Dev Puri Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Roopwati Vs State of Haryana

Manmohan Singh Vs State of Haryana

Khazan Singh Vs State of Haryana