Petitioner withdrew the public interest litigation as the strike by Safai Sewaks had already been withdrawn. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP( PIL) NO.21367 of 2011 Date of decision: 18.11.2011
Subodh Verma
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLR MR.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate for Mr.H.C.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M.KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel states that strike by Safai Sewaks posted in the
Municipal Committees in the State of Punjab has already been withdrawn.
Therefore, he does not press the present petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(M.M.KUMAR)
JUDGE
18.11.2011 (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) Mks JUDGE
Subodh Verma
State of Punjab
M.M.KUMAR
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
