Petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one; the court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.21160 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.11.2011
Meena Kumari
... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana & others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present : Mr. Sanjay S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Permod Kohli, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged only the administrative instructions and the matter needs to be considered by the learned Single Judge.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh one.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(Permod Kohli) Judge
November 16, 2011 (Tejinder Singh Dhindsa) sonia Judge
Meena Kumari
State of Haryana
Permod Kohli
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
