The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed civil writ petition no. 19771 of 2010, holding it became infructuous, upon hearing by the learned counsel for both sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 19771 of 2010 Date of decision : 13.10.2011
Darshna Devi and another
...Petitioners
versus
Divisional Canal Officer and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. P.K. Ganga, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. D. Khanna, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate
for respondent No.3.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that this writ
petition becomes infructuous, which may be dismissed as such.
Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this
relevant connection.
In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for.
October 13, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Darshna Devi and another
Divisional Canal Officer and others
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
