The High Court dismissed the withdrawn Civil Writ Petition on the prayer of the petitioner to enable filing a fresh petition after defect removal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after removing defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 18790 of 2009 Date of decision : 20.10.2011
Naresh Rani
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. C. S. Brar, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant
writ petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition, after removing the serious defects in it.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for, with the aforesaid liberty.
October 20, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Naresh Rani
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
