The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the conveyance deed for the disputed plot had already been executed in favor of the petitioner by the authorities.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 16799 of 1991 Date of decision : 17.02.2011
M/s Bakson Industries
...Petitioner
versus
Haryana State Small Industries Development Corporation and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset and very fairly, learned counsel has submitted that the instant petition has become infructuous, as the conveyance deed of the plot in dispute, has already been executed, in favour of the petitioner, by the Authorities.
In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
February 17, 2011 G.Arora
M/s Bakson Industries
Haryana State Small Industries Development Corporation
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
