The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition as the reliefs claimed had already been granted to the petitioner, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 1679 of 2010(O&M) Decided on : 17-01-2011
Mool Chand
....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana
MAHESH GROVER, J
Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Smt. Krishna, Assistant, office of Director, Department of Industries, Haryana has stated that the necessary reliefs which have been claimed in this petition have been granted to the petitioner and thus the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Ordered accordingly.
January 17, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge
Mool Chand
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
