The High Court dismissed a civil writ petition after the petitioner elected to avail an alternative remedy by way of an appeal against the impugned order, granting liberty to file such appeal.
The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 16379 of 2010
M/s Suave Automotive Corporation
...Petitioner
Versus
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Dev. Corp. Ltd. & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr. Agam Jund, Advocate for Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tribhuvan Dahiya, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 3.
Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State.
RANJIT SINGH J.
In view of the short reply indicating that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal, counsel for the petitioner says that he will not press this petition and would first avail his remedy of filing appeal.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to
file an appeal against the impugned order.
January 31, 2011 rts
(RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to pursue the available alternative remedy of filing an appeal or allowed to rely on the writ petition.
M/s Suave Automotive Corporation
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Dev. Corp. Ltd.
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
