Petitioner filed an application to dispose of the underlying writ petition as infructuous after settlement. Court allowed the application and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No. 13743-44 of 2010 in/and CWP No. 15224 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : 31-01-2011
Rajesh Kumar Sharma
....Petitioner
VERSUS
M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. and another
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel , Advocate for the applicant/respondent no.1
Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab
Ms. Vertika H Singh, Advocate for non-applicant/petitioner
MAHESH GROVER, J
CM No. 13743 of 2010
Allowed as prayed for.
CM No.13744 of 2010 and CWP No. 15224 of2009
The instant application has been filed with a prayer that the instant writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the matter has been settled with the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has confirmed the factum of
the settlement and has no objection if the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous as the petitioner's grievance has been redressed.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous.
January 31, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge
Rajesh Kumar Sharma
M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.
another
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
