The petitioners withdrew the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent forum. The court dismissed the petition accordingly without adjudicating on merits.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 1386 of 2009 Date of Decision: 14.11.2011
K.C. Chhibber & Company and others
........Petitioners
vs.
Punjab and Sind Bank and another
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocate for the respondents
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail remedy as is available under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
However, grant of liberty shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy. As and when the petitioners avail their remedy, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(G. S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
14.11.2011
reena
K.C. Chhibber & Company and others
Punjab and Sind Bank and another
Hemant Gupta
G. S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
