The single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon satisfaction that the claim for Rs. 2.00 lacs had been paid to the petitioner, rendering no further order necessary.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous after payment proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13054 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION : 19.3.2013
Smt.Krishna and others
...Petitioners
Versus
U.H.B.N.L. And others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
PRESENT: Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Kuldip Singh, Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4
Notes: 1.Whether to be referred to the reporters or not?
2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for respondents has produced proof of payment of Rs.2.00 lacs to the petitioner which satisfies the claim made in this petition. No further order is required to be passed.
This petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE
19.3.2013
MFK
Smt.Krishna and others
U.H.B.N.L. And others
Rajiv Narain Raina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
