“Keeping in view the overall interest of all the parties concerned, we are of the opinion that the matter can be remanded back to the highest authority, as a one time measure, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases. Since, we are remanding the matter back to enable the highest authority to review all the cases, it would not be necessary to set aside the impugned orders. In case, the review applications of individual petitioners are accepted, undoubtedly, the impugned orders would be set aside by the highest authority. In case, the review application is dismissed in a particular matter, naturally, the impugned order will be maintained. It has been however, pointed out by Mr.Ram Saran Dass, learned counsel appearing for some of the petitioners, that eviction proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 are pending on the basis of the orders of resumption. The petitioners are at liberty to move an application for stay of the aforesaid proceedings by bringing to the notice of the Court of competent jurisdiction the orders passed by us today.
