Petitioner challenged his transfer from Ambala to Panchkula claiming it was an incidence of service with no case for interference. The High Court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12848 of 2011
Ram Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Naveen Daryal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The petitioner has been transferred from Ambala to Panchkula. Transfer is an incidence of service. No case for interference is made out.
Dismissed.
July 22, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
Ram Kumar
State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
