The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking reinstatement and 90% salary. Found no ground for interference as the petitioner faces criminal proceedings under Section 302 IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.1235 of 2011
Date of decision : 21.1.2011
Sandeep Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present : Mr.Yesh Paal Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
There is no ground to interfere. The petitioner is facing criminal proceedings under the provisions of Section 302 IPC. During the pendency of the proceedings he was suspended and granted 90% of the salary. His plea for reinstatement at this stage cannot be considered. The petition is dismissed.
21.1.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
dss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for reinstatement and salary during criminal proceedings under Section 302 IPC can be entertained.
Sandeep Kumar
State of Haryana
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
