The High Court dismissed a writ petition sought to be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for appropriate remedy.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to approach the DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.11811 of 2011 Date of Decision.11.07.2011
M/s Sharma Communications, Railway Road, Guruharasahai, Tehsil Jalalabad, District Ferozepur, through its proprietor Tarsem Lal son of Manohar Lal, resident of Muktsar Road, Guruharasahai, Distt. Ferozepur
.....Petitioner
Versus
The authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Branch Guruharasahai, Tehsil Jalalabad, District Ferozepur, through its Manager and another
.....Respondents
Present: Mr. Vinod Khunger, Advocate
for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
aforesaid.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
July 11, 2011 Pankaj*
M/s Sharma Communications
The authorized Officer, State Bank of India
Manager (another)
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
