A plea for the extension of parole already granted to a life convict was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. W.P. No. 92 of 2011
DATE OF DECISION : 17.01.2011
Balbir Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL
Present: Ms. Bhupinder Pal Kaur Brar,Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
The petitioner, who is a life convict and is undergoing sentence in B. I. & J. Jail, Ludhiana, has filed this petition for the extension of parole, already granted to him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that she does not want
to press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
January 17, 2011 ( M. JEYAPAUL ) ndj JUDGE
Balbir Singh
State of Punjab
Satish Kumar Mittal
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
