Petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file fresh. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-33501 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.02.2011
Rajneesh and others
.....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. Sunil Polist, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.`
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the
petition with liberty to file fresh as the compromise has been effected between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
February 23, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE
Rajneesh and others
State of Haryana
DAYA CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
