The court disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail in an FIR under various IPC sections. Based on the respondent's submission that details of co-accused were furnished, the interim order was made absolute.
The interim order granting anticipatory bail was made absolute and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc No. M 30255 OF 2010
Gurcharan Singh vs State of Punjab
Present : Mr. J.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gazi Mohd. DAG Punjab
The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.70, dated 4.9.2010, registered under Sections 323, 452, 380, 427, 506, 148, 149 of the IPC, at Police Station Division No.3, Ludhiana.
Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Karnail Singh, states that the petitioner has given the details of the alleged coaccused and he is not required for further investigation.
In the circumstances, the interim order dated 12.10.2010 is made absolute.
Petition stands disposed of.
( AJAY TEWARI )
February 23, 2011. JUDGE `kk'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to an order of anticipatory bail in the criminal facts.
Gurcharan Singh
State of Punjab
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
