Amarjit Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought protection for property possession under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against private threats. The single judge held the plea misconceived, concluding efficacious remedies exist via civil proceedings or filing a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the violators.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as devoid of merit; no protection granted under Section 482 Cr.P.C.