The petition was dismissed as not pressed since the matter had been amicably settled between the parties. No substantive legal proposition was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24064 of 2010 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.01.2011
Harpinder Singh
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
Present : Mr. Joginder Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG Punjab
Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the complainant – respondent No. 2
ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as complainant state that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, hence, proper legal course would be to settle/compound the offence, in view of this present petition be dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(ALOK SINGH) JUDGE
reena
06.01.2011
Harpinder Singh
State of Punjab
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
