Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition on 25.1.2011, seeking liberty to pursue alternative remedies. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.21969-M of 2009 Date of Decision:25.1.2011
Nisar
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of any other alternative remedy in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
25.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Nisar
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
