Two separate oral orders from the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing civil petitions withdrawn by the respective petitioners upon counsel's prayer. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
Permission to withdraw petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.337 of 2011 Date of decision: 05.09.2011
Ajit Singh
.... Petitioner
Versus
Nachhattar Singh and ors.
..Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI
Present:Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Permod Kohli, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter stands compromised between the parties. He wants to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE
05.09.2011 sonika-II
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M NO.20802 of 2011
Date of decision: 18.10.2011
Chand Ali
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present:Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.
Ajay Tewari, J.(Oral)
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this petition.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE
18.10.2011 sonika
Ajit Singh
Nachhattar Singh and ors.
Chand Ali
State of Haryana
Permod Kohli
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
