The High Court maintained its dismissal of a petition challenging a Special Judge's acquittal of respondents in offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19-MA of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 05, 2011
Chander Pati
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Badlu Ram & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate, for the applicantpetitioner.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Crl. Misc. No.19-MA of 2011 [2]
benefit was not given by the police officials. The relationship between Ashok and Narender with the complainant is admitted. The statement of complainant has been supported by Kitaba, father of Ashok, who is also an interested witness. PW-2, Om Nath Nagar is also an interested witness as he is related to the complainant.
(AJAI LAMBA)
September 05, 2011 JUDGE avin
Crl. Misc. No.19-MA of 2011 [3]
Chander Pati
Badlu Ram
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
