Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petition, relying on an affidavit filed on the last date of hearing. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M 18960 of 2011 Date of decision : October 20, 2011
Harpreet Kaur and another,
...... Petitioners
v.
State of Punjab and others,
...... Respondents
*******
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. Harmanjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. L.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S.Chandumajra, DAG Punjab
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the affidavit,
filed on the last date of hearing, the petitioners do not wish to press this petition at this stage and pray for permission to withdraw the same.
Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
( AJAY TEWARI )
October 20, 2011. JUDGE `kk'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harpreet Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
