The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlining criminal proceedings had already been quashed in a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-18126 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.07.2011
Lokesh Gupta
... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab & others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present: Mr. B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab.
Ms. Anju Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.
Mahesh Grover, J. (Oral)
In view of the fact that the proceedings in FIR No.768 dated 23.10.2009 registered at P.S. Kotwali, Bathinda and all consequent proceedings arising therefrom have been quashed, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as has been rendered infructuous.
July 26, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) sonia Judge
Lokesh Gupta
State of Punjab
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
