Single judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for bail, rejecting the argument that the petitioner did not cause death and thus was not a flight risk or dangerous element.
Application for bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-17999 of 2011
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Date of Decision: November 29, 2011
Crl. Misc. No. M-17999 of 2011
Hasan Mohd. @ Hassan
…..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr.J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The shot fired by co-accused of the petitioner Haseem is allegedly caused the death of Sawle. The petitioner is alleged to have also fired at the deceased causing pallet injuries on his shoulder as such he cannot be granted the concession of bail on the ground that the shot fired by the petitioner was not the cause of death.
No ground is made out to grant the concession of bail at this
stage.
Dismissed.
Crl. Misc. No. M-17999 of 2011
[2]
November 29, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is alleged to have caused injuries but not the death of the deceased.
Hasan Mohd. @ Hassan
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
