Allowed
Mamta Rani & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/1698/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL REVISION NO.1698 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: FABRUARY 14, 2012
Netra Pal
.... Petitioner
Versus
Smt. V. S. K. D. Smith & others
.... Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N. C. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Harkesh Manuja , Advocate for respondents No.5 to 11.
None for remaining respondents.
L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
For reasons recorded in the order of even date passed in Civil
Revision No.1697 of 2011 titled Netra Pal versus Smt. V. S. K. d. Smith &
others, the instant revision petition is also allowed in the same terms.
(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE
14.02.2012 'raj'
Netra Pal
Smt. V. S. K. D. Smith
L. N. Mital
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court