This short order declared that the petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition was rendered infructuous. The court observed that no petitioner was present and dismissed the petition accordingly with no substantive legal issues addressed.
Petition declared infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No. 16059 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.10.2011
Sandeep Kumar
.. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rajesh Bindal)
Judge
17.10.2011 mk
Sandeep Kumar
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
