Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. The Single Judge dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to the granted liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-13543 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.8.2011
Rujdar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J (oral).
Status report on behalf of the State has been filed in court.
The same is taken on record.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedy.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
11.8.2011 'rajpal'
Rujdar
State of Haryana & others
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
