In this brief order, the High Court granted absolute bail to the petitioner who had joined investigation, noting that recovery from co-accused rendered custodial interrogation unnecessary.
Interim bail granted on 4.5.2011 was made absolute and the petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-12628 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 14.7.2011
Mukim
..Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Haryana
..Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present : Mr. Salim Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ashish Gupta, AAG Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Satpal Singh, stated that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required as recovery of the material allegedly stolen, has already been made from the other co-accused.
Considering the aforesaid fact, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 4.5.2011 is made absolute.
The petition stands disposed of.
14.7.2011 Meenu
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
Mukim
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
