The petition in Criminal Misc. No. M-11444 of 2011 was disposed of as withdrawn on the statement of counsel for the petitioner. No substantive legal proposition is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-11444 of 2011
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-11444 of 2011
Date of Decision: November 15, 2011
Aappu @ Ashwani Kumar
…..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana.
Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J.
On the statement of counsel for the petitioner, the petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
November 15, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
Aappu @ Ashwani Kumar
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
