Partly allowed
Bimla Devi v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11306/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge held that as the trial court is seized of the case against petitioner No.1, the petition for quashing her involvement cannot be allowed, while the petition regarding other petitioners was dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Quashing dismissed qua petitioner No.1 due to trial court seizure; disposed of as infructuous for petitioners No.2 and 3.