Bail application by the petitioner in a criminal trial where prosecution evidence was complete. The High Court held there was no ground to grant bail as defence evidence was due to be recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM No. M-10330 of 2011 (O&M)
Suresh
..... Petitioner
vs
The State of Haryana
..... Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. B. S. Saroha, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that prosecution evidence is already complete and now the case is fixed for defence evidence and arguments.
Considering the stage of the trial, I do not find any reason to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
Dismissed.
8.7.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner at the stage where prosecution evidence is complete and defence evidence is fixed.
Suresh
The State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
