In view of the above, the contention as raised by the counsel for the petitioner, in the present petition, requires to be accepted as the Division Bench of this Court has held the term 'complete address' as defined under Rule 10 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 means the Postal Address or even the Postal Index Number. As per the terms of Section 3 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976, the provisions of Rule 10 providing for printing of Postal Address or Postal Index Number shall be deemed to be complete address for the purpose of Act or the Rules framed thereunder as well before 13.1.2007. As in this petition the sample was taken after the said date, the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court would be squarely covering the case of the petitioner, as the manufacturer i.e. M/s EPIC Food Products Pvt. Ltd. had, although, not mentioned the name of the State but had mentioned the Postal Index Number, which the Division Bench of this Court has found to be sufficient compliance of Rule 32(c)(i) of the Rules, 1955. In any case, petitioner is not the manufacturer but is only a licensor therefore, it cannot be held liable for violation of Rule 32 of the Rules 1955.
