“17. This bone of controversy can be decided after perusing the evidence led by both the parties. In this regard, cross-examination of respondent Vijay Kumar is very much relevant because he has admitted in his cross-examination that previously there was wooden self in the shop in dispute. He has further admitted that in place of wooden shelf a concrete shelf ahs been constructed. He also admitted that floor tiles were fixed and at present there is flooring marble tiles. He also admitted that for fixing marble tiles walls were broken. This admission on the part of the respondent shows that for fixing marble tiles on the fllor and on the wall, the floor and walls were broken, but he has not taken any permission from land lord and from rent rent controller from doing so. He also admitted that in the civil suit filed by the appellant/petitioner in which stay was granted. He also admitted that contempt proceedings were also initiated against him for violation of the order of the civil court when the respondent did not stop making the addition and alteration in the demised shop, then the petitioner/appellant was compelled to file civil suit for permanent injunction which was titled as Sanjiv Maria and others versus Vijay Kumar and others which was decided by the court of Shri Jaspinder Singh, the then Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Jalandhar, copy of said Judgment and decree is Ex.PX and Ex.PY and vide this decree, present respondent was restrained from
