Parveen Kuamr and Anr. v. Pawan Kumar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR No.6284/2011 Date of decision: 09.11.2011.
Parveen Kumar and another
....................Petitioners
v.
Pawan Kumar and another
.....................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh
Present: Mr.NS Dandiwal,Advocate for the petitioners.
Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral)
Defendants/petitioners have filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the order dated 5.9.2011 (P9) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bathinda whereby application moved by respondent no.1/plaintiff for permission to prove the family settlement dated 26.8.2002 by way of secondary evidence has been allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parveen Kumar
- petitioner
another
- respondent
Pawan Kumar
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/6284/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court