High Court crowned Civil Revision enhanced by withdraw as allowed with liberty to challenge another order passed by trial court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to challenge order dated 22.12.2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.2485 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: April 18, 2011
Smt.Sunita Yadav
.....Petitioner
v.
Dr.Hemo Prabha Saikia and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
C.M.No.9983-CII of 2011
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Civil Revision No.2485 of 2011
The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 29.3.2011, Annexure P13, vide which the learned trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for framing additional issue and another application for amendment of the written statement.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this revision petition with liberty to challenge as per law order Annexure P8, dated 22.12.2010, passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gurgaon.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with aforesaid liberty.
18.4.2011
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
meenu
Sunita Yadav
Dr. Hemo Prabha Saikia and others
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
