High Court dismissed a civil revision against an interim order allowing an expert examination of handwriting and fingerprints in a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note, holding no merit due to available judicial discretion.
Civil revision dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.1005 of 2008 Date of Decision.03.10.2011
Natha Singh son of Chagger Singh son of Sher Singh, r/o village Bambiha, Tehsil and Distt. Bathinda
.....Petitioner
Versus
Sukhdev Singh son of Ajmer Singh r/o village Bambiha, Tehsil and District Bathinda
.....Respondent
Present: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
(K. KANNAN)
JUDGE
October 03, 2011
Pankaj*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether plaintiff could be permitted to examine handwriting and fingerprint experts in a suit for recovery of money due on a promissory note.
Whether there is merit in the civil revision against the interim order.
Natha Singh
Sukhdev Singh
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
