The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellant had deposited the requisite amount under the one-time settlement scheme, making the appeal unnecessary.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R.S.A No. 877 OF 2009
D.R Roller Flour Mills Pvt Ltd vs The Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd and another
Present : Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narinder Hooda, Advocate for the respondents.
Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has deposited
the requisite amount under one time settlement scheme and that this appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
( AJAY TEWARI ) January 15, 2010. JUDGE
`kk'
D.R Roller Flour Mills Pvt Ltd
The Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
