transferable. Consequently, licence holder has no right to transfer the same. It is correct that in the instant case, the licence holder has not alienated the licence by way of sale. However, Bye-laws also provide that on the death of licence holder, the licence can be transferred only in favour of son or widow of the deceased licence holder subject to fulfillment of necessary conditions. In the instant case, plaintiff seeks transfer of the licence in her favour on the basis of Will. However, the plaintiff is daughter-in-law of the deceased licence holder. Consequently, in view of specific provision in the Bye-laws, the licence cannot be transferred in favour of the plaintiff as licence can be transferred only in favour of the widow or son of the licence holder. The plaintiff is bound by the Bye-laws under which the licence was issued. Consequently, there is no infirmity in the finding of the courts below that plaintiff is not entitled to seek transfer of the licence in her favour. Orders of the defendants rejecting prayer of the plaintiff for transfer of the licence in her favour are also justified and do not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. Legality or validity of the Byelaws has not been challenged in the suit. No question of law much less substantial question of law arises for determination in the instant second appeal. The appeal is completely without any merit and is accordingly dismissed.
