(2), PLR, 624 , decided by this Court. The facts of the aforesaid cases, are clearly distinguishable, from the facts of the instant case. In State of Punjab's case (supra), from the evidence, on record, Wazib-Ul-Arz document, forming part of record-of-rights, was completed after 18th day of November, 1871. It was not expressly stated, in that document, that the forest or quarry or land or interest, in the estates, belonged to the Government. In these circumstances, the Apex Court, held that, the lands, in such estates, including brick-earth, in them, shall be presumed to belong to the concerned land owners, as was envisaged by subsection (2) of Section 42 of the Land Revenue Act. In the instant case, as stated above, Wazib-Ul-Arz, the document, forming part of the record-of-rights, was completed, in 1849-50, i.e. before eighteenth day of November, 1871, wherein, it was not expressly recorded, that the forest or quarry or land or interest, in the estates or brick earth, belonged to the land owners. In these circumstances, according to Section 42(1) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, the statutory presumption, operated, in favour of the State Government, that the forest or quarry or brick earth belonged to it. Not only this, as stated above, in Wazib-Ul-Arz, exhibit D2, for the year 1914-15, produced by the respondents, it was, in clear-cut terms, recited that, the minor minerals, if discovered later on, on the land, in dispute, shall vest, in the State Government. So, from both these documents, as stated above, the presumption did not operate, in favour of the land owners, but, in
