A short order in a revisional appeal where the judge directed parties to see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 978 of 1993 (O&M)
Raj Pal (deceased) LRs and another
....Appellants
Versus
The State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG Haryana.
RAJESH BINDAL J
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed today in RFA No. 168 of 1992 titled as Asa Nand and another Vs. State
of Haryana.
1.9.2010.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
Raj Pal (deceased) LRs and another
The State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
