The High Court dismissed R.F.A. No. 5532 of 2008 by reference to a separate detailed order passed in R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006, titled Sudama and others vs. The State of Haryana and another.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 5532 of 2008 (O&M)
Hukam Singh and others
...... Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate, for HUDA.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 1824 of 2006, titled Sudama and others Versus The State of Haryana and another.
01.10.2010
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
sarita
Hukam Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
