Single-paragraph order dismissing the appeal by relying on the reasons recorded in a separate order of the same date in a related proceeding.
Appeal dismissed in view of reasons in another order of even date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 515 of 2003 (O&M)
State of Haryana
....... Appellant
Versus
Dharam Chand and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Ashish. Gupta, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
None for the land owners.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 5737 of 2001 Harbhajan Singh and others Versus State of Haryana and another the present appeal is dismissed.
04.08.2010 sarita
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harbhajan Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And AnotherFollowed¶12
R.F.A. No. 5737 of 2001 Harbhajan Singh and others Versus State of Haryana and another
State of Haryana
Dharam Chand And others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
