Mehar Singh & Others v. U.T.Chd
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive decision recorded in this judgment; this order references decisions recorded in a separate judgment.
No substantive decision recorded in this judgment; this order references decisions recorded in a separate judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 4461 of 2001 (O&M)
Mehar Singh and another
...........Appellants
Vs.
Union Territory, Chandigarh
........Respondent
CORUM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate, for the respondent.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 2016 of 2001, titled Sadhu Ram and others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh.
05.10.2010 shivani
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Mehar Singh
Union Territory, Chandigarh
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court