The court vide this order referred the detailed reasons for the instant appeal to a separate order passed in R.F.A. No. 3541 of 2006 (Nand Ram and others vs. State of Haryana and others) dated 14.09.2010, which contained the substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 4005 of 2009 (O&M)
Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation
....... Appellant
Versus
Daulat Ram and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the land owner.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 3541 of 2006, titled as Nand Ram and others Versus State of Haryana and others.
14.09.2010 sarita
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nand Ram and others Versus State of Haryana and othersReferred¶14
Nand Ram and others Versus State of Haryana and others
Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation
Daulat Ram
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
