The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal in the same terms as a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No.2886 of 2002 without recording detailed reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 3896 of 2003 (O&M)
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
....... Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashish Gupta, AAG, Haryana, for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for respondents no.3 and 4.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No.2886 of 2002 Indian Oil Corporation Limited Versus Om Parkash and others the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
26.07.2010 sarita
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
